User talk:Nx

Hi Nx. I'm afraid that you'll be initially constrained by Trent's vandal break. :-( --Bob M 15:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help on the templates. Much appreciated.--Bob M 16:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Nx 16:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping out when my wiki-knowledge starts to run a bit thin.--Bob M 16:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Rag Top's on RW: (Linda I think?). Australian female sailing enthusiast. Toast 21:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Lynne, actually, but well remembered.RagTop 22:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Lynne, always had a problem with names. Toast 22:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks, I'm going to check thoroughly before the export anyway, this is just so I don't forget stuff I already know :) Nx 07:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Proxima
I think slowly removing stuff so that she doesn't notice is the best route. We have made a small amount of progress, like fixing the dates. Phantom Hoover 08:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No. Someone will listen. We cannot let her remain there. Nx 08:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * But until someone turns up? Anyway, she's reprotected the page. Oh, do you know who Epsilon is? Phantom Hoover 08:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oooh, a block. But I wasn't encouraging the vandal, merely giving them formatting tips! Phantom Hoover 09:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikiindex
You've been unblocked. Phantom Hoover 07:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Woo hoo! Human 07:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC) - Wait, what about you, oh magical vacuum cleaner? Human 07:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Yes, you too, apparently. Human 07:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

OK, I don't know how this happened, but I got edit buttons at the RW article, so I cleaned it up. But it was never unprotected, and I sure as hell was not sysopped. So, guys'n'gals, please go make sure what I wrote is accurate and clear and appropriate? Kthxbai :) Human 08:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I get it. PC's protection expired is all... Human 08:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

The Great Exodus
I thought that was going to RationalWikiWiki? Pi 03:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Me too. Why? Nx 05:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * We wrote it for ourselves as well. RWW is such a backwater nothing ever gets the mob treatment (ie, anyone noticing, lots of editing). Human 05:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd say put in both places. Then edit it to be more sarcastic funny  in RWW and more serious in RW.--Bob M 06:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * (from userpage) I thought that one was going to RationalWikiWiki?. Nx 05:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Naw, RW will post it as well. They can copy it, or you can port it to both sites. Human 05:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Technical questions

 * WIGO CP will need to be edited to have "real" voting added; will we keep the joke "vote" template in the wigos themselves?.
 * I will do that and I'll keep the fake votes in a comment at least, so we don't lose them. We can later decide what we want to do with them. Nx 06:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. I think we should leave them in the WIGO itself.  They are a part of our history, after all, and most are pretty funny.  No need to use the "vote" template for them, though.  Perhaps just put them in quotes? Human 06:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * We could add something like this in from of the wigo text: (fake vote:pi/2) Nx 06:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * If all edits are copied over, we're gonna get some weird archive problems.
 * Archives will not be copied over. They have no history, so we can just copypaste them into new archives on RationalWiki. Nx 06:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll trust you on this :) Human 06:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)