Teflpedia:Lesson namespace/Pros and cons

The "Lesson:" namespace at Teflpedia is under consideration for removal or renaming. See Teflpedia:Lesson namespace.

Please add your pros and cons for the continued separate existence of the "Lesson:" namespace, below! Thanks!

Pros for the separate existence of the Lesson namespace

 * "Lesson:" is descriptive. (Good when it is accurate, bad when it isn't)
 * "Lesson:" is short. (Short is important, see Teflpedia:Lesson namespace)
 * "Lesson:" we already have it. (Good if Lesson is a good name, bad if it isn't)
 * ...[add more]...

Cons for the separate existence of the Lesson namespace

 * "Lesson:" is inaccurate for many pages that are for teaching (rather than about teaching) yet are not lessons, eg tests, grammar tips, lists of conversation questions.
 * "Lesson:" is confusing folks everywhere it is applied to pages that are not clearly lessons.
 * "Lesson:" has failed our stress test, it doesn't consistently fit.
 * Presumably, all the pages which are currently listed in the "Lesson:" namespace (which are actually lessons and not activities) will feature in the lesson category directory, so no loss there.
 * The abolition of the "Lesson:" namespace will help categorization by avoiding the tendency to load all things usable in class under one heading i.e. warmers, energizers, lessons, activities, games etc.
 * ...[add more]...

Please add your pros and cons for the combination of the encyclopaedic and lesson namespaces.

Pros for the merging of the two namespaces

 * Simplicity in searching.

Cons for the merging of the two namespaces

 * Potential confusion in searching.