Talk:Coffee conversation questions

Onion, the pseudosuffixes holic, aholic and oholic are very productive. Below some Google results (all terms entered enclosed in quotes).
 * alcoholic: 23,600,000. alcoholaholic: 20,000. alcoholholic: 1050. alcoholoholic: 238. alcoaholic: 143
 * shopaholic: 4,130,000. shopoholic: 345,000. shopholic: 64,300.
 * workaholic: 1,940,000. workoholic: 106,000. workholic: 75,000
 * shoeaholic: 1,350,000. shoeholic: 812,000. shoeoholic: 6500
 * chocoholic: 1,060,000. chocaholic: 249,000. chocholic: 22,200. chocolateholic: 10,300. chocolateaholic: 4130. chocoaholic: 4010. chocooholic: 2420. chocolateoholic: 138. chokholic: 138.
 * twitaholic: 743,000. twitterholic: 234,000. twitteraholic: 6640. twitholic:1400. twitteroholic: 853
 * coffeeholic: 236,000. coffeeaholic: 66,600. coffeeoholic: 1600
 * teaholic: 27,500. teaaholic: 11,600. teeaholic: 4170. teaoholic: 1070. teeoholic: 491
 * dogaholic: 20,100. dogoholic: 3450. dogholic: 2630
 * pastaholic: 19,200. pastaoholic: 40. pastaaholic: 9
 * appleholic: 14,300. appleaholic: 1410. appleoholic: 385
 * wikipediaholic: 9670. wikipediholic: 9180. wikipedioholic: 54. wikipediaaholic: 1
 * beeraholic: 7440. beeroholic: 6270. beerholic: 4690
 * tobaccoholic: 2730. tobaccoaholic: 4
 * lingerieholic: 1630. lingerieaholic: 54. lingerieoholic: 4
 * cheesecakeholic: 256. cheesecakeoholic: 46
 * parakeetholic: 2

Note: my spellchecker doesn't flag shopaholic, workaholic or chocoholic as mistakes. Ghoti (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed that when the edit was made - but then I decided that it made no real difference.--Bob M (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I find the holic suffix is ridiculous, but I wonder how Onion had never heard the word coffeeholic. Ghoti (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I've ever actually heard the word, but the meaning is pretty transparent. But whether or not it is better to use simple vocabulary in these questions is an open point. Typically our questions are, in general, a little bit more intellectually stimulating (and often more controversial) than those found on other sites, so a higher level vocabulary is perhaps justified.--Bob M (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)